Home

Advertisement

Customize

July 2009

S M T W T F S
   1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031 
Powered by LiveJournal.com

In the beginning

I feel pretty uncomfortable making my first post, so I’m going to skip over all the boring preliminaries and go right to what’s been rattling around in my brain lately.

 

Have you ever thought about how you use light in your writing?

 

I was under the false impression that I was doing an effective job by showing shafts of sunlight flooding into a room, the feel of warmth on a character’s shoulders . . . but it wasn’t until I went to a show of Gregory Crewdson’s work at the Williams College Museum of Art that it struck me how how much deeper the emotion level of my writing could become simply by using light to a better advantage.

For those of you not familiar with Crewdson his visual art is amazing. The art show compared him to Edward Hooper, but personally I find Crewdson much deeper.  Looking at his work, I was first struck by the story on the surface: familiarity and distance, darkness and light. Then his careful use of light plunged me into a desire to understand what lay below the surface. His art has a theatrical feel of ordinary situations seething with unspoken emotion.

  

Granted, it’ll take visualization and plenty of forethought to unobtrusively work light into my writing, but if light is such a major tool for the visual artist, then why not use it to its full benefit in my writing? Instead of showing mood or tone with a dim room or bright morning, how about written images of people in a room separated by light, an upturned face jaundiced by  a candle’s flicker, a mother’s hands caught in the light of an opening oven door . . . geesh Crewdson’s done weirded my brain.

 

I could go on forever letting my mind drift and never get back to my novel.  And I can’t leave my characters trapped in the between-realm forever—or perhaps I should.

 

 

 

 

Comments

This reminds me of the scene in Apocolypse Now where we first see Kurtz, in which Marlon Brando dips in and out of the shadows, playing with the edge between light and dark.

As much as anything else, it makes me wonder why I ignore the shadows.

(Anonymous)

Great thoughts, Patty. I'll be interested to see how you use this. I'm a big fan of light although I haven't thought of what it could do for any of my stories.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gregory_Crewdson

It seemed rather impolite not to include to include a link that shows some of his images. However it can't compare to seeing the real wall-sized images.

Waves hello to Mary and anonymous--I post fairly often on LJ, but unually end up being anonymous because I forget to see if I'm logged on.
I love the idea of using light to create specific images and emotional undercurrents, rather than just as atmosphere. In that context, it's not the light itself that's interesting. It's the way it interacts with the other elements of the scene.
Great thoughts, Patty. I'll have fun playing with this in my current story, which takes place entirely at night.

You also make me want to sit down with my favorite paintings and listen to them for awhile. :)
As with any visual element, you have to work hard to convey the effect you want without being overly verbose, and slowing the story down with descripions (something I strongly suspect I'm prone to).

I do worry a little about using light to indicate mood. It's done commonly in film (and not just light, but also weather, which is somewhat related), and it's often done in a very hackneyed way. Whether it's X-Files (wandering around dark houses by torchlight) or your standard thunderstorm-as-emotional-tension, it's a technique that I am suspicious of, because it's cheap and easy (background music is often used the same way). It's almost like a shorthand - instead of genuinely building atmosphere, you just press a button marked "impending doom" or "happiness".

Don't get me wrong; I love light in art (I'm a fan of Caravaggio and Josiah Wright of Derby, and Atkinson Grimshaw, and John Martin, and so forth). And there's nothing wrong with using it in fiction. But I just think one has to be cautious about the dangers of using it as cheap shorthand. A great song lyric is "Nothing bad could ever happen under a sky this blue", and for me, that's the challenge - have the brilliant blue sky and the birds singing as the backdrop, the counterpoint and juxtaposition, to something horrible. For me, that (when it works) is far more powerful.
Nice to hear from you.
I totally agree and that's part of what I've been thinking about. It's easy to slip into using light in cliche ways instead of putting thought into it.

However I suspect there are times when the shorthand use of cliche helps key in the reader without slowing the pace.

I detest cheep background music on TV almost as much as shower scenes with knife wielding villians. Just once I want the naked girl to pull off the shower curtain and smother the guy.
I wanted to post this earlier, but ran into trouble with LJ's denial of services...

I've never given much thought to light in my fiction--save as a dramatic prop (I know only three kinds of light: winter sun, golden evening sun and moonlight). Clearly there are much greater nuances than my paltry ones :)

I do have one character who's obsessed with light in my novel--and it shows in her point of view.

Advertisement

Customize